Re: baidarka finishes

Chris & Ellen Kohut (chriskayak@earthlink.net)
Fri, 14 May 1999 21:50:51 -0400

Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 21:50:51 -0400
From: Chris & Ellen Kohut <chriskayak@earthlink.net>
To: baidarka@lists.intelenet.net
Subject: Re: baidarka finishes

I think that the issue is that you need something with the

absorption capabilities to sink down to the stringers on the

first coat of application. This sets the nylon into a

waterproof skin and stiffens the skin as well, as the skin is

just as much part of the stiffening/flexing dichotomy as the

wood is.

That is to say: a stiffened skin in some part acts as part of

the frame as well. Baidarkas anyway, (I don't know about

greenlander construction), have notoriously sloppy mortise and

tendon joints in the thwarts and no method of fastening the

ribs into the gunwale where the shaved down rib meets the socket

in the gunwale. It is up to the skin, which must be stiff and

tight to hold it all together. If you've done it right, the

entire boat will sound like one of those large drums used in

celtic music. (for my edification, anyone here know what one

of them suckers is called?)

Whatever you decide to dope the nylon with, it must

fill the weave and dry there, right to the bottom of the

opposite side of the skin.

Having had no experience with anything but Dura-Tuff,

I'm afraid I can't help you with information on any other

product.

This is perhaps why there is a large contingent of baidarka

makers that will only use cotton duck on their boats, as oil

paints will work (eventually), on their craft. Takes forever

to dry. They are all old men by the time they get to the shake

down cruise. Doubtless there are those on the list who will fly

to the defense of canvas duck and oils......

Consider the nature of nylon, there is nothing natural

fibered about it, pure synthetic, (thanks Dupont), and must

be heat/acid dyed to put a pigment in it at it's manufacture.

Strong, light stuff though, to be sure.

Stay upright