Re: baidarka densities

Subject: Re: baidarka densities
From: Andrew Lukban (lukbaa15@hscbklyn.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 21 2000 - 13:33:32 EST

Next message: Bill Leonhardt: "Re: baidarka stability/performance vs. flexibility"
Previous message: Andrew Lukban: "Re: baidarka stability"
In reply to: Douglas Ingram: "Re: baidarka stability"
Next in thread: Peter A. Chopelas: "RE: baidarka stability"
Reply: Andrew Lukban: "Re: baidarka densities"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Douglas Ingram wrote:
>
> Or, EXACTLY, 1 kilogram per litre.

or 1 [gm/(cm^3)]! ;)
...as compared to 11.365
-
Baidarka Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be
reproduced outside Baidarka or Baidarka archives without author's permission
Submissions: baidarka@lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions: baidarka-request@lists.intelenet.net
Searchable archive: http://rtpnet.org/robroy/baidarka

Next message: Bill Leonhardt: "Re: baidarka stability/performance vs. flexibility"
Previous message: Andrew Lukban: "Re: baidarka stability"
In reply to: Douglas Ingram: "Re: baidarka stability"
Next in thread: Peter A. Chopelas: "RE: baidarka stability"
Reply: Andrew Lukban: "Re: baidarka densities"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Mon Jan 01 2001 - 01:00:02 EST