Re: [baidarka] atlatl analysis

Subject: Re: [baidarka] atlatl analysis
From: RCH3149@aol.com
Date: Thu Apr 24 2003 - 10:38:05 EDT

• Next message: J R RM: "Re: [baidarka] atlatl analysis"
• Previous message: Skip Snaith: "[baidarka] atlatl analysis"
• Maybe in reply to: Skip Snaith: "[baidarka] atlatl analysis"
• Next in thread: J R RM: "Re: [baidarka] atlatl analysis"
• Maybe reply: RCH3149@aol.com: "Re: [baidarka] atlatl analysis"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In a message dated 4/24/2003 10:12:03 AM Eastern Standard Time,
kyak@rockisland.com writes:

> <SNIP> ... Experimenting with replicas is easy enough to do if you're so
> inclined...
>
> Skip

Thank you for the first hand information, Skip!

Richard Baugh and Robert Perkins in their respective work and analyses appear
to disagree on the significance of the use of stones (as weights). Do you
have any more information on this issue?

Best regards,
Ralph

-
Baidarka Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be
reproduced outside Baidarka or Baidarka archives without author's permission
Submissions: baidarka@paddlewise.net
Subscriptions: baidarka-request@paddlewise.net
Searchable archive: http://rtpnet.org/robroy/baidarka

• Next message: J R RM: "Re: [baidarka] atlatl analysis"
• Previous message: Skip Snaith: "[baidarka] atlatl analysis"
• Maybe in reply to: Skip Snaith: "[baidarka] atlatl analysis"
• Next in thread: J R RM: "Re: [baidarka] atlatl analysis"
• Maybe reply: RCH3149@aol.com: "Re: [baidarka] atlatl analysis"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Thu May 01 2003 - 01:30:02 EDT