Re: [baidarka] Gunwale height

Chris Kohut (chriskayak@earthlink.net)
Thu, 16 Jul 1998 19:26:00 -0400

Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 19:26:00 -0400
From: Chris Kohut <chriskayak@earthlink.net>
To: baidarka@lists.intelenet.net
Subject: Re: [baidarka] Gunwale height

At the risk of inspiring incendiary missives, (INCOMMING!!!!) might I ask, if
there are skinning materials such as nylon out there,(which I found to be
fairly easy to work with), what are the properties and advantages of choosing
#10 canvas? Or are there better skinning materials than the two mentioned?
Or is this part of the great Vanilla/Chocolate debate?
Chris
David Baranoski wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Wolfgang Brinck wrote:
>
> > I have built baidarkas using white pine for gunwales (1.75") and none of
> > them has broken, but I think white pine is less elastic than some other
> > woods and in time can take a set or warp more easily than stiffer more
> > elastic lumber species.
> >
> > An extra quarter inch (2" gunwale) should be sufficient since stiffness
> > goes up with the cube of the height - if you do the math, you will find
> > that adding a quarter inch will increase stiffness by 50%, adding 1/8th
> > inch will increase stiffness by 22%, so have at it.
> >
>
> Wolfgang,
>
> I'll go ahead with using 2 inches for the gunwales. Lake Ontario can get
> up there sometimes, and the white pine/stiffness question hit my paranoia
> button. I'll sleep better at night now. I think I'll stay away from the
> archives for a while...just sourced a local supplier of #10 canvas duck,
> and I don't want to see that you've been advocating nylon :)
>
> Thanks for the reply; and I'll apologize for getting your book a little
> dog-eared.
>
> David Baranoski
> Thorold, Ontario
> Canada